Not many dog owners want to know the science behind animal learning; they just want their pet to "be good". But it is imporant for ME, as a trainer, to be conscious of it so that I can offer the most effective and humane training possible, rather than following traditional conventions or current fads blindly. Why humane? Well, besides the obvious, some confrontational methods will get you, your child or your neighbour bitten and your dog euthanized or in a shelter. (See the UofP study below on causes of aggression) There are plenty of new and old myths and buzzwords out there so it is worth understanding the science behind what dogs do and how they learn so that you can evaluate them critically. I am always happy to recommend reading and seminars for those who are interested in learning more about behavioural science. ~ Karin Positive reinforcement training through operant conditioning started thanks largely to innovators like Karen Pryor, Dr. Ian Dunbar and Jean Donaldson
as well as clicker trainer extraordinaire Bob Bailey (pictured with Dr. Jesus Ruiz-Rosales of North Texas University and with Karin [r] and friends at the 2008 CAPPDT Conference). ![]() Finally, and importantly, I do believe in having fun when I am helping people to train their dog. We want to enjoy our dogs and spending time with them. I like to see dogs eager to work and have fun with us. I like to see families having fun and enjoying their dogs too! It benefits everyone. *More on Punishment Punishment works. Really. It can suppress behaviour -- sometimes -- if you are very good at applying it correctly. But, it can also do one or more of the following undesirable things: - drive the problem underground (suppression) so that it is hidden but not resolved and waiting to resurface in unknown circumstances (taking the ticker out of the time bomb as Dr. Ian Dunbar says) - cause resentment or confusion and make the dog anxious or dull and uninterested in learning - make the dog associate the punishment with the wrong element in the situation (another dog, a child, the room or the person doing the punishing) - cause the dog to defend itself against the aggressor This will certainly result in frustration or worse for the trainer! I prefer that a dog willingly cooperates rather than submits out of fear or threat of discomfort or pain. Unlike an older child, the dog can never understand why something is being asked of them, so they view the world very simply. Either something is rewarding to do or it is not. I believe the opposite of reward is no reward. There are simple non-punitive ways to withhold a reward for the dog so that an unwanted behaviour goes away. This works for bad habits as well as aggression and fear issues. NEW!! A Recent Study on Aversive Training Methods A recent study by the Veterinary School at the University of Pennsylvania examined how dog owners respond to aggressive behavior in their dogs. (The abstract for the study can be found here.) They also asked owners if the technique(s) they used resulted in an increase, decrease or no change in the dog’s behavior. Owners that used aversive or punishing techniques saw a higher rate of aggression and continuing “bad” behavior in their dogs. Owners who used non-aversive and non-punishing techniques (such as teaching an alternative behavior) saw a much lower rate of aggressive responses. Here is a little of what they found: The highest frequency of aggression occurred in response to aversive (or punishing) interventions, even when the intervention was indirect: • Hitting or kicking the dog (41% of owners reported aggression) • Growling at the dog (41%) • Forcing the dog to release an item from its mouth (38%) • “Alpha roll” (forcing the dog onto its back and holding it down) (31%) • “Dominance down” (forcing the dog onto its side) (29%) • Grabbing the jowls or scruff (26%) • Staring the dog down (staring at the dog until it looks away) (30%) • Spraying the dog with water pistol or spray bottle (20%) • Yelling “no” (15%) • Forced exposure (forcibly exposing the dog to a stimulus – such as tile floors, noise or people – that frightens the dog) (12%) Non-aversive methods resulted in much lower frequency of aggressive responses: • Training the dog to sit for everything it wants (only 2% of owners reported aggression) • Rewarding the dog for eye contact (2%) • Food exchange for an item in its mouth instead of forcing the item out (6%) • Rewarding the dog for “watch me” (0%) According to the author of the study, “confrontational training techniques can provoke fear in the dog and lead to defensively aggressive behavior toward the person administering the aversive action.” No suprise, this trend also occurs in children treated with corporal punishment. Researchers at Tulane University released the results of a 1998 - 2005 retrospective study showing that even mild corporal punishment such as spanking results in more aggressive behaviour as the child matures. Here is the link to this pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/peds.2009-2678v1study. |

